TiZNO does not retain your client data

For a regulated institution, the fear that a vendor will quietly accumulate client files is enough to stop a procurement before any technical detail is discussed. TiZNO is built so that this concern has a concrete answer. Zero data retention is the architecture, not a configuration option. Client PII and operational data are processed in memory for the duration of an agent run and are not written into TiZNO’s database.

Structured data, balances, KYC status, and risk ratings, stays in your systems. TiZNO reads it through read-only, audited connectors and does not copy those fields into its own store as a system of record. Ad-hoc client documents are parsed for the session in which they are needed and are not written into a long-term content index. No client PII enters the policy index; that index holds your internal policy and procedure corpus only.

What TiZNO does keep is deliberately narrow and tenant-isolated: case summaries, adjudication outcomes, artefacts held pending a decision, and the immutable execution trace. Original evidence files remain in your own storage, and TiZNO records metadata rather than the document itself. Raw model prompts and completions are never persisted at any layer.

In GDPR terms, this positions TiZNO as a data processor acting under your instruction, not as an independent controller aggregating depositor data for its own purposes. Your data processing agreement and sub-processor review still apply. Before any client goes live, inference runs on enterprise API contracts that contractually prohibit use of your data for model training.

The practical payoff appears in diligence. You can describe, truthfully, a processing model where the bank remains the system of record, where TiZNO maintains no parallel client warehouse, and where evidence of processing lives in your own audit exports rather than in a vendor’s opaque datastore.